Identify where your field intersects with societal needs, challenges, and opportunities.
Which societal needs and issues most connect to your research? Which societal issues are most important to you, or the future of your field? Reflect on where exactly you can see yourself having societal impact, and remember that these activities can expand and develop over the course of many NSF-funded projects. Dream big, but start with a realistic plan over the next three to five years that can launch you towards realizing larger societal impacts goals over time.
Compelling Broader Impacts plans build on past experiences, genuine interests, and the networks and contexts unique to each researcher. Integrate these components into your plan.
Structure each proposal in a way that sets yourself up to connect your research and education aims with societal needs over the course of your NSF-supported research career.
Understand and articulate how your Broader Impacts plan advances NSF's vision for the Broader Impacts of Research (see NSF Strategic Plan and Broadening Participation and Diversity in the Resources section below.)
Think carefully about the goals of your Broader Impacts plan. Make sure you have short-term and long-term goals, and a pathway of resources, activities, and partners that connect them. Prioritize your efforts and time around specific goals that can be tracked and measured.
Broader Impacts is not simply a list of unrelated, or random outreach activities. Focus on a plan that is rooted in societal needs and interests and use data/literature to demonstrate the need for your Broader Impacts plan.
You don’t have to reinvent the wheel for your Broader Impacts plan to be innovative. In fact many of the best plans leverage, expand, or reimagine, a variety of existing resources on campus and in the community (contact us about our ‘NSF-ready’ community partners).
Broadening participation of members of underrepresented groups in STEM is an NSF priority.
Build on best practices. If you want to work with young people in out-of school settings, what are the best practices for doing so? If you decide to focus on STEM teacher development, what is currently known to be the most effective approach? If you decide to focus on public science communication, what are the best methods and platforms for scientists that use this approach, how do you reach public audiences, and how do you measure the impact?
Reference the literature (ie. STEM education, scientific literacy, diversity in STEM, workforce needs) and NSF data ( i.e. NSF Science and Engineering Indicators) to show how your Broader Impacts plan is relevant. Identify the key societal issues you will address, and the evidence-based methods you will use. Approach this plan as you would a scientific research problem, with literature cited, research questions, methods, and a plan to share results.
Are there particular skills, knowledge, or experiences that would enable you to do this work with more insight and credibility? Consider workshops, seed grants, and fellowships for faculty with the Cornell Institute for Teaching Innovation, Diversity and Inclusion, or Community Engagement.
Join forces with outside experts to ensure that your plan will be successful. In doing so, think about the opportunities and resources that are already at Cornell, in the community, or in your wider professional network.
Leverage your network or local Community Partners to strengthen your efforts, effectiveness, and access to the public. Science museums, public media, public service or public health center, youth programs, and professional societies are all potential partners for Broader Impacts. Peers and public-facing offices in your department and across campus can be resources and partners.
Establish good relationships with Broader Impacts partners. Nurture partnerships and keep them current, even when grant deadlines are not looming. Ensure that the expertise, needs, and aims of your partners align with your interests so that everyone benefits from the partnership.
Community-based partnerships can often help researchers to directly broaden participation of members of underrepresented groups in ways that that might not be possible on your own.
Partners may have capacity and expertise in program evaluation.
Most broader Impacts plans require a variety of resources to have an impact.
Allocating a realistic budget for broader impacts shows commitment to the work and credibility in a way that plans without such budgets do not.
Like research partners, community partners often require budgets and resources for these projects. Demonstrate that you value the partners contributions and expertise by budgeting for their time and involvement.
Be sure to discuss with your partner how much they will need to complete the work outlined.